Recent Changes in the CertCost group   -   WikiHelp   -   Search ecowiki.org:

« 00063 · Edit Form · 00065 »

Chiappara E (Chiappara, E.)1, Fallico B (Fallico, B.)1 (2008 ) ANALYSIS OF THE ITALIAN PUBLIC FOOD CONTROL SYSTEM AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO EUROPEAN HYGIENE AND SAFETY LEGISLATION

Report, ITALIAN JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
CHIRIOTTI EDITORI, PO BOX 66, 10064 PINEROLO, ITALY

Document:

Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the Italian Public Food Control system, describing the skills and roles of each part of the Public Authority that is well defined by national legislation. There is a lack of coordination among the official structures involved in control, with frequent overlapping of activities. The paper, also, focuses on the problem of implementing the EU safety and hygiene legislation in Italy. The complex administrative structure in the area of food control could be a barrier to the development of an effective national food safety system that adequately enforces current EU policy. The regions are becoming the main channel through which EU directives and regulations are implemented, but structural differences between regions and the political choices of the local governments create some difficulties for receiving and implementing EU legislation. The impact varies throughout the country. The establishment of a National Authority for Food Safety, which will be scientifically and hierarchically independent can only be justified if it can guarantee concrete coordination of all the control structures as well as act as an advisory body.

Keywords: consumers; EU legislation; food safety; legislation

Relevance to our study:
This study is relevant because of the effective food control systems are essential to protect the health of consumers. The structure and control is quiete different across the EU and variety of political and economic conditions have led to difference in the way community transposed in national law and operational systems for food production and inspection. They should be coordination among the stakeholders in order to establish a good communiction channel.

Relevancy on a scale from 1 to 5 = 3

Review status:
Review started on 2009–07–08
Reviewed by


Comments:

CertCost homepage

Task 1.2: Document Review

Tools

  • Upload file (for reviews: use the Enter new review form)

EcoWiki HomePage

Edit SideBar

Page last modified on July 28, 2009, at 11:19 AM - Edit Page